Apocryphicity

A weblog devoted to the study of the Christian Apocrypha

About Apocryphicity []

Apocryphicity (ă-pok-rif-is-iti) n. 1. a recently coined term for describing the qualities of apocryphal literature. 2. a recently created weblog (or blog) dedicated to discussion of Christian apocrypha.

Welcome to Apocryphicity. This blog has two aims. The first is to report on developments in the study of Christian Apocrypha (a.k.a. non-canonical Christian literature) in the form of media excerpts, reviews of scholarly literature, and the occasional mention of apocryphal texts and traditions in popular culture. The second is to provide a forum for those interested in the Christian Apocrypha (scholars and non-scholars) to exchange ideas and information.

Apocryphicity is maintained by Dr. Tony Chartrand-Burke who teaches Biblical Studies at the Atkinson School of Arts and Letters (a part of York University in Toronto, Canada). The opinions expressed here are his own.

Anyone interested in the topic of the Christian Apocrypha is welcome to read the posts and, if inspired, add comments. From time-to-time I offer courses on the Christian Apocrypha and Gnosticism; students of these courses are encouraged to participate also.

I would be very grateful if readers would send me links to recent developments online regarding Christian Apocrypha (ancient, medieval, or even modern) along with your own comments if you have any. These can be sent to my e-mail address (tburke@yorku.ca) or can be submitted simply as a comment to any of the blog postings.

Be sure to check out my homepage which features pages related to the CA (including links to other websites and an on-going bibliography project), as well as the web’s premier Infancy Gospel of Thomas page and material related to other research projects.


Contact Tony

Categories

Archives

“The Funeral of Jesus”: A New Passion Gospel?

April 1st, 2007 by Tony
Several weeks ago I posted the beginning and ending of a fragment of a text I referred to as the “Funeral of Jesus” which I recently came across in a manuscript catalogue entry. I have since obtained the manuscript and have begun the process of deciphering the text. This is no easy task. While the manuscript is well-preserved, the proliferation of abbreviations makes reading the text quite difficult. I offer this preliminary report on the text with the hope of generating some discussion on its contents. Though I believe the text has never been published, I am curious whether anyone in the field has encountered it before.

The text occupies two pages in a 15th-century manuscript of miscellaneous texts. It has no title and in its current form appears fragmentary—i.e., the beginning and perhaps the ending are missing. The story essentially is as follows:

Joseph of Arimathea is given the body of Jesus for burial. Nicodemus hears of this and comes to Joseph and offers his assistance in the burial. The two bring a burial cloth and ointments and take the body down from the cross. Joseph tells Nicodemus that Jesus appeared to him (the following few sentences are unclear). Joseph reports that the priests of the temple commented on how strange that Jesus’ kin had not come to prepare Jesus for burial. Nicodemus goes to the temple to request Jesus’ body (next several sentences unclear). Nicodemus comes from the temple and places the body of Jesus in the tomb of Joseph. They roll the stone over the entrance and return to their homes. After three days Jesus rises. The priests and scribes say that Joseph and the disciples stole the body (the next few sentences are unclear but there is mention of “the property of James”). The priests and scribes incite a mob against Joseph and they bring Joseph to the high priests. They ask Joseph why he has stolen the body. Joseph responds that he could not take the body because of the guards posted there by Pilate. The priests and the people are furious and go to Pilate accusing Joseph.

I still have an additional half page to read and, as noted above, several sections remain obscure. Still, at this point a few things are clear. The text is not from any single gospel but does contain elements of at least John (Joseph’s and Nicodemus’ preparation of the body) and Matthew (the slander that Jesus’ disciples stole the body). Yet the text is not simply a harmony as it contains much that is new. Several well-known apocryphal texts discuss Joseph’s role in the burial of Jesus—the Gospel of Nicodemus, the Narrative of Joseph of Arimathea, and even the Gospel of Peter—but none of these appear to be the this text.

I will post additional comments on the text as I work through it over the next several weeks. Again, feedback is welcome. One of the reasons I created Apocryphicity was so CA scholars could exchange ideas on ongoing projects. So, I encourage others to take full advantage of this resource.

Posted in Funeral of Jesus | | Permalink

3 Responses

  1. Antonio Lombatti Says:

    Hi,

    I remember that the gnostic fragmentary texts, among others the Gospel of Gamaliel, had similar burial scenes (some of them were published by E. REVILLOUT in «Patrologiae Orientalis, II [1907]). I’ll check all my volumes and photocopies to see if I could be helpful.

    I’ve been studing Jesus burial for years, so I am interested in any text about it.

    One question: how has your manuscript been written? Greek, Coptic, Hebrew, Latin?

    Thanks,
    Antonio

  2. Antonio Lombatti Says:

    May I link your discovery on my website. It sound iinteresting.

    Antonio

  3. Tony Says:

    Antonio,

    Thanks for the mention of the texts. I’ll have to look at them again down the road sometime. The manuscript is Greek. And, yes, you can put up a link on your site.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.